Category: Lifestyle

  • Talk To Your Kids About Sex Before Someone Else Does

    Talk To Your Kids About Sex Before Someone Else Does

    My kids get a bit confused when they hear stories about the lies we tell children about sex to “protect” them.  They just don’t understand what the big deal is.

    A few months back, I was reading an article about sex (shocker, I know…).  Marcia was looking over my shoulder at what I was reading and asked what the article was about.  I told her some people would prefer to shield their children from sex and sexual images because they think it’s inappropriate for them to know and instead tell their kids things like a stork brings a newborn baby.  She asked me why would they do that. I told her even though sex is a natural part of being human, there are lots of people who are uncomfortable talking about it, and think if you talk about it with kids then the kids will want to go out and do it.  And as a result, it has an impact on the ability of some people to give accurate information when they talk to their children about sex.

    To give Marcia an example of a child getting incorrect information, I told her about an episode of the TV show “Mad Men” this last season where Don Draper’s grade school aged daughter Sally says she knows what sex is and that the adult in the conversation doesn’t correct the misinformation because the topic is uncomfortable.  Here is the dialogue from the episode “The Chrysanthemum And The Sword” between Sally Draper and her babysitter:

    SD: “Are you and daddy doing it?”
    The babysitter (shocked): “What?!”
    SD (boldly): “I know what it is. I know that the man pees inside the woman.”
    Babysitter (concerned): “Where did you hear that?”
    SD: “A girl at school.”
    Babysitter: “You should talk to your mommy.”
    SD (sadly): ”I don’t want to.”

    After I told Marcia this story, she said to me, “That’s what the kids at school say! They say that the man pees inside the woman when they have sex!”.  Marcia was in 3rd grade when she heard this; two whole grades before this topic is even addressed in the curriculum at her school.  One thing to realize: at this young, prepubescent age urine IS the only thing that comes out of the penis so it is understandable that kids think that.  Understandable, but not excusable.  I was surprised at this outburst of new information and clarified to make sure she knew that’s not what happens.  Whew.  I’d totally lose all of my sex educator street cred if she did believe that!

    Now, I know Mad Men is a fictional TV show set in the 1960’s.  I understand this is pretty accurate for how sex and sexuality was approached back then but it makes me sad to think that almost 50 years later there are still many parents who are not much more engaging or forthcoming than in this make-believe interaction.

    The conversation in this TV show very well could be a conversation in real life today. Here is a little girl who is bold enough to say she understands more than she is being told and wants to talk about it.  Asking a question about the source of this “information” instead of correcting the misinformation makes it seem as if the information is correct.  As I said before, not correcting misinformation is in itself a message.

    It is not the babysitter’s job to discuss sex with the child — it could have been an aunt, a cousin, or another adult — but in any case, it most definitely would be up to them to tell the parent(s).  Giving a play-by-play might be embarrassing but the parent absolutely needs to hear that the child is asking so things can be discussed.  It is in this moment when the child starts asking that a parent should be open and ready to answer questions or at least be comfortable with saying, “I don’t know, but let’s find out together.”

    Something to note here: do not be angry, offended, hurt or any other emotion if your child starts the conversation about sex with someone other than you.  It doesn’t necessarily mean they don’t trust you or feel comfortable talking to you.  Perhaps the timing or situation was just right to ask, but take the opportunity now yourself to sit down together.  When you do, please make sure you try to find a basic, matter of fact voice to use…one where there is no judgement or bias.

    I was chatting with a few other moms recently and we got into the conversation about how and when to start talking to your kids about sex.  I related to them what I did, and what seemed to work for my children as a starter.  Of course, you’ve heard me say it before, I do not believe in “The Talk” as a one-time event; It’s an ongoing conversation. Anyway, years ago, when my children were maybe 3 and 5 years old, we sat down with a book on sex and sexuality (more along the lines of “where do babies come from”).  I read the book ahead of time so I would know, while we were reading and one of them had a question, if that answer would be addressed in the book or not… and also to know where in the book to skip ahead to if needed.  I personally sat down with both of my daughters together; I know some parents cringe at the idea of having a younger sibling listen in.  I’m sure to some extent Cindy absorbed that it was an intimate conversation and I was willing to have it.  I do believe she just enjoyed the sound of my voice because she was too young, she wasn’t so interested in the topic at the time, and it all just went over her head.  Marcia on the other hand, soaked it in like a sponge.

    If your kids are already hitting puberty, don’t worry if you haven’t already started the conversations.  Just start now.  One way to start is this talk is not just penis in vagina/bird and bees stuff.  Start with puberty, you know, the changes that their bodies are going/going to go through.  There’s a lot of stuff happening to these little bodies.  Do you recall your first wet dream? Did anyone talk to you before it happened? If not, were you freaked out?  Do you remember your first period?  Did anyone talk to you before it happened?  If not, did you think you were dying?  We can save our children from the fear that is sometimes associated with these mundane, harmless facts of life.

    They probably know more than you think.

    Bottom line, sheltering your children is not helpful to them.  You are not with them all the time and other kids, or movies, etc have a greater amount of influence the older they get.  It is your job as the parent to give your child the tools and information they need to succeed in life.  This is no different.  If you would prefer that your child gets the correct information about sex, then sexuality needs to be discussed and accurate information needs to be shared by you.  I’m sure you don’t want someone else to do it for you.

    This article has been republished with permission from Lanae St.John. Please visit Lanae St.John’swebsite  to view the original post and more of Lanae’s works.

  • If she’s not having fun, you have to stop

    If she’s not having fun, you have to stop

    My training as a sexologist makes me aware of people, things, and situations around me that have a sexual component to them.  The latest is a situation that I’ve observed for a while now and I could not put my finger on it as to why it concerned me.

    Let me explain:

    I have a guy friend who is a divorced dad of a 9-year-old girl.  Evidently, as the daughter was growing up, the two of them became very close because the mom was very sick.  This father/daughter combo is very loving; they sit quietly with each other affectionately and evidently, always have.  She is very protective (possessive?) of her father as he now ventures into the dating scene.  And, like most dads, he is extremely aware of her changing prepubescent body, and nervous about the conversations he will need to have with her about the same.  It’s touching for me to see this relationship really, given that this is not the type of relationship my girls have with their father.

    Well, over time, I have seen that this father/daughter pair wrestles a bit.  You know, playful roughhousing.  She’ll say something to tease him and he’ll quickly swoop in and put his arm around her shoulders and squeeze her in to him and she squeals with pleasure.  Or she’ll give an answer to something that she knows is wrong as they work on homework together and he’ll give her “the Knuckle”, a move that sends her into fits of giggles as he pokes his knuckle into her side or back.

    While I see them when they aren’t being rough, it struck me this past weekend why I’ve been struggling with this roughhousing – he has not started having conversations with her about dating (his own), divorce, love, relationships, puberty, etc, etc. – yet I begin to wonder – will this roughness become a familiar feeling that she will seek out in her adult romantic relationships?  Does she realize she can say “stop”?  There are times when he is pretty rough with her, not that she’s a shrinking violet or anything; she’s not.  She is a confident, happy, seemingly secure little girl.  I’m sure she is thrilled at the 100% attention and affection from her father – what little girl wouldn’t be? But as I wrote in an earlier blog, when we are young adults and even in childhood we are developing what Jack Morin in his book “The Erotic Mind” calls the Core Erotic Theme (CET).

    “Your Core Erotic Theme begins its long evolution during childhood and is first sketched out in fantasies and daydreams you probably don’t remember. Because these early images almost certainly grew out of impulses and interests considered inappropriate for children, they were veiled in secrecy. Even now you probably still keep certain ultra-personal turn-ons–-those that spring from your CET–-hidden from other people and quite possibly even from yourself.”

    Aside from the potential Core Erotic Theme, if I were the dad in this situation, I would have a conversation with my daughter about Consent; that I love her unconditionally and that our roughhousing is play.  Most importantly, that she has permission to say “no thanks” if she’s really not in the mood or “stop” when it’s too much.  I would also tell her that as she gets older she should always feel comfortable speaking up whenever she doesn’t want to be touched.  Whether it’s a slobbery kiss from a grandparent, or tickling from a cousin, or whoever she is playing with, that she should always feel comfortable saying “no” without worrying about hurting the other person’s feelings.  And that whoever she loves and who loves her shouldn’t play rough with her if she doesn’t like it.  Ever.

    To the dad, I will say something.  When I do, I will take a page from a blog I read not that long ago.  The dad tells his two-year old son, who is roughhousing with a little girl/friend, “If she’s not having fun, you have to stop.” Adults should note that a child “doesn’t need to know what sex is or what rape is to know what a partner is. If your partner isn’t having fun, you stop.”

    With my own girls, as they were growing up, anytime we had a tickle fight, I told them that if they ever said “stop” I would stop immediately.  My thinking was, I am much bigger than they are and I never wanted them to feel overpowered or not in control.  It has become a game to them.  If we have a tickle fight, they will giggle and laugh uncontrollably, almost to the point of not being able to breathe, they yell STOP, action stops immediately. Then they smile and say “go”.  And it starts all over again.

    All of this reduces to one incredibly important concept: CONSENT. It is age appropriate – for ANY age – and a solid foundation onto which a parent can build future talks about sex and sexuality.  This is one example of talking to your kids about sex and sexuality in a way that has NOTHING to do with penises or vulvas but is just as important, if not more so.

    xxoo

    2011 The MamaSutra

    This article has been republished with permission from Lanae St.John. Please visit Lanae St.John’swebsite  to view the original post and more of Lanae’s works.

  • Sexual Authenticity and Your “True Self”

    Sexual Authenticity and Your “True Self”

    Over on Facebook, Gloria Brame recently posed the question:

    Do you change when you go on vacation? Do you become someone you are not at home? Topic came up in therapy today.

    The answers were pretty varied. Here are a few of them.

    • True side can come out not so much different
    • oh yes, eagerly so
    • I am always me. I have no need to be anything more or less.
    • Always being authentic is the way to go. Lying is a lot of work and getting found out isn’t pretty.
    • I’m more carefree. …childlike
    While the original question wasn’t about sex, it reminded me of one of the topics that I’ve seen a lot of people struggle with. What does sexual authenticity mean, and how do we know what it looks like?

    It’s a tricky thing. Authenticity can be taken to mean “being your true self” or “acting in alignment with who you are” and I see some value in those definitions. It’s easy to see that if you’re in the closet about your sexual orientation, your gender identity, your sexual practices, your relationship structure, or any other aspect of your sexuality, you’re not living as authentically as you might. Of course, there are many reasons that people choose to be in the closet, and it’s not always a bad thing. If you need to keep quiet about your personal life in order to maintain your employment, that’s a perfectly fine cost-benefit analysis. The fact that other people have different options or make different choices doesn’t mean that your decision is wrong.

    At the same time, I think the response about lying is important to unpack because I don’t think there needs to be a dichotomy between authenticity and lying. That’s what really struck me about the original question because for me, it’s not so much about becoming a different person. Instead, it’s about allowing a different part of myself to come to the surface. That’s also what role play feels like to me. I can’t do it if I don’t have that personna within me. For me, it’s not about acting a part. It’s about making room for a different piece of myself to emerge.

    Authenticity doesn’t mean that you’re the same person in all circumstances. It means that whatever situation you’re in, the parts of yourself that people see are genuine rather than being a front or a mask. It’s speaking your truth, even if it’s not the whole truth. Authenticity has room for privacy, but not for secrets. It has room for boundaries, but not for lies. And it has room for being a different person in different situations, simply because most people are pretty complex.

    To quote Walt Whitman, “Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes.” I see no conflict between that sentiment and my desire to me true to myself. What about you?

    This article has been republished with permission from Charlie Glickman. Please visit Charlie Glickman’s website  to view original post and more of Charlie’s works.

  • A girl and her adorably insufferable Frenchman

    A girl and her adorably insufferable Frenchman

    What happens when you put a true-blue anal Singaporean and a Parisian from the city of love together? For two individuals who are alien to the norms of the other party’s dating scene, the process and eventual outcome can be slightly confusing, a little frustrating and more often than not, very bemusing.

    The French’s notion of dating (or lack thereof) can be more than a little daunting for one who is exploring unchartered territory. It all starts when you meet a hilarious guy who speaks English liy zis. The time is right; the ambience strikes; and the chemistry flows. The night goes on and soon everyone around melts into the background and it becomes a private party of two.

    Before long, the dinner ends and you make a move—after some fumbling and an exchange of numbers. The next day, you wake up to an unexpected message from him and before you’ve had the time to gather your thoughts, you’re swept into this vortex where you can barely comprehend what is happening as you’re invited to dinners with his flat mates, drinks with his friends, and chill out sessions with (very possibly) the entire French population in the local scene—all taking place simultaneously. Hanging out is fun. The food is fabulous; the fromage, magnifique on every level, C’est la vie they say. All these while, he continues to address you as “Hey!” when suddenly, BAM! you’re getting questions from his friends on how did both of you meet and them telling you about his little quirks before making the “Oooooo, Ahhhh… Both of you are kinda cute together” remarks. You regard him with a questioning look while he gives a beaming smile and ruffles your hair. Things get complicated for the Singaporean because this is clearly deviating from the makings of a platonic friendship. What is happening?

    By then, we had already gone out for seven times, of which none was considered a date by my definition as almost all of these involved caviars, foie gras, lasagna (nevermind that it is not French), heaps of to-die-for cheese and of course, a constant stream of people to pass the plates around. A date is meant to be on a one-on-one basis and hence, the confusion sets in. You begin to notice that everyone indeed is beginning to refer to both of you as a couple while he is barely doing anything to set the record straight. Then one fine day—aka two weeks, five group dinners, one rugby match, and one movie later—he asked the question that eventually sent me frantically googling on this queer homo sapien who has by then, lured me into the world of kir, tapenade, and homemade croque monsieur (yes, men who CAN cook are damn sexy and I’ll probably die a death by gluttony).

    Him: “May I kiss you?”

    Me: “Seriously?”

    [Silence]

    Him: “I would like to kiss you.”

    Me: “Haha. You’ve got to be kidding.”

    Being the skeptical, cynical, and very unromantic Singaporean, I did my best to keep my cool and brushed him off before sending the rest of the evening on google-land. To my bemusement (and slight annoyance), I then realized that I am not the only one who has been utterly lost:

    French critique of dating essentially relies on their rejection of any clearly defined relationship. They do not designate anyone as dating material, but rather hang out in groups and allow the mutual interest between two members of the group to arise spontaneously. The French find absurd the very idea that there is a point in a relationship after which people suddenly become a boyfriend and a girlfriend. “Dating” as a concept does not exist in France—you like someone, you hang out with them in a larger group. [source: http://datingstrategist.blogspot.sg/2013/01/not-dating-like-french.html]

    And so Volia! We eventually had the kiss and did the deed (and that’s another story). Since then, he has been trying to acquaint himself with the Anglo-Saxon dating model. As the saying (kinda) goes, “When in Singapore, do as the Singaporeans do lor”.

  • Play The Long Game

    Play The Long Game

    When it comes to creating a sexual connection with someone, one of the most useful things you can do is play the long game. That means that rather than only focusing on what can happen tonight or right now, you lay the foundation for the future. Of course, there’s still plenty of possibility for a hook-up or a one-night thing or having sex on the first date, if that’s what you both want. But even in those situations, playing the long game means creating opportunity for a future connection with that person.

    Here’s an example from my personal life. A couple of years ago, I met Sarah at a party. It was clear that we had a mutual attraction and we had a lovey time flirting with each other. By the end of the night, we exchanged phone numbers and I figured that we’d get together sometime soon for dinner or a drink and see where things would go.

    It turned out that that wasn’t going to work out quite like that. Sarah was in an open relationship and her partner was totally fine with what had happened, but they were going through some stuff and it wasn’t a good time to add any new variables to the mix. So when Sarah explained that to me, I told her that I completely understood, having been in a similar situation with my partner, and that I’d still really enjoy getting together another time.

    When we had dinner, we had a lovely evening. Sarah and I had a lot to talk about and we kept things friendly, but not flirtatious or sexual because there was a clear boundary in place. I figured that either things would change at some point and we could revisit the question, or they wouldn’t and I would have made a new friend. Either way, it looked like a win to me. At one point, we took the opportunity to talk about that and we both made it clear that the interest was there. That made it much easier to set it aside and have a really good time.

    Over the next couple of years, we got together every so often. We moved through some of the same circles, so we always had plenty to talk about and have a fun get-together. And when things changed and the possibility of having sex opened up, we’d laid the groundwork to be able to have that happen. There wasn’t any awkwardness about it because we’d both been clear in our intentions and the reasons for refraining, and we’d developed a connection that had room to put our cards on the table.

    Playing the long game means taking the larger view. We were willing to invest a little time into building a friendship that made room for future possibilities. It’s a shift in perspective that can make things much easier.

    When you take the long view, there’s more room for everyone’s boundaries. Rather than pushing to make something happen immediately, you can create some space for whatever each person needs. That demonstrates your commitment to everyone’s well-being, including any other people affected by the situation such as other partners, their kids, etc. Supporting everyone’s well-being is one of the hallmarks of sex-positivity and it demonstrates respect. It also shows your willingness to calibrate your relationships to fit everyone involved.

    Playing the long game is a great way to show that you understand the difference between “not right now” and “never.” You might be in a relationship with someone who’s sexually unavailable because of stress, work crises, family difficulties, physical or medical challenges, or anything else. Stepping back and looking at things from a larger perspective can make it easier to remember that unavailability isn’t the same as rejection.  It helps you avoid slipping into a shame spiral because you know that things will change.

    My partner and I have been together for over twenty years and we’ve had plenty of phases when one or the other of us simply wasn’t available for sex. Knowing that a gap of a few weeks or months was a temporary situation within the context of our relationship makes it much less difficult when those things happen. It used to feel like the end of the world, but we’ve learned that it’s simply temporary.

    Of course, some people say “not right now” when they mean “not ever.” Playing the long game only works when there’s enough honesty for both people to make informed choices. And sometimes, people have medical issues or mental health healing that can take a while to resolve. Being committed to doing the healing work that needs to happen is how we demonstrate that we’re aiming to make it a “not right now” situation. If we expect our partners to work with us in good faith, we need to demonstrate a good faith effort.

    Here’s another way to play the long game. I was recently flirting with someone who I know from various polyamorous and sex-positive communities. We’ve always had a sweet, flirty friendship, but they recently got into a relationship with someone and they were wanting to focus their attention on that rather than flirting with anyone else. So I thanked them for telling me and said that I would take that as our new baseline. I also asked them to let me know if that ever changed so we could check in and see where we were.

    I didn’t say that I would necessarily be available to flirt again because I don’t know for sure that I’d have the room for it. There are plenty of reasons why I might not, and taking care of my future self means remembering that things might change for me. So instead, I simply said that we can see where things are if it ever becomes relevant. There’s a big difference between saying, “if something changes, I’ll be available” and “if something changes, let’s check in and talk about it.”

    Playing the long game means thanking people for telling you what their boundaries are. As Monique Darling puts it, when we say no to something, we’re saying yes to something else and it’s usually ourselves. I’d much rather know that someone can tell me where their “no” lies because otherwise, how can I trust their “yes”?  I don’t have any reason to question, push, or test their boundaries. It means that I take them at their word because there’s a big difference between playing a long game and not taking no for an answer. And while it’s true that some people say “no” when they don’t really mean it, I’d rather filter those folks out. I’m not willing to try to guess what “no” means.

    Of course, this is only relevant when there’s a mutual interest and it really is a “not right now” situation. If the other person isn’t available or declines an invitation, there’s no reason to question that or expect it to change. Granted, some situations do change eventually, but I don’t want to make it seem like I’m advocating for waiting around to see or for disregarding someone’s boundaries. When there’s a clear no, the best bet is to thank them for their clarity and move on.

    In those genuine “not right now” moments, one of the most important pieces to playing the long game is being able to express your attraction and your desires without attachment to the outcome. Some dating advice suggests that being the first one to express interest puts the control in the other person’s hands. There’s a small grain truth to that, since there’s a vulnerability that comes from being the first to open up. But don’t overestimate the size of it. This isn’t a question of control, which after all, is a zero-sum “I win or you win” game. Instead, it’s about creating something where everyone wins and sometimes, the most powerful thing you can do is be the first one out on the dance floor. With control, either I have it or you have it. With power, we can both have it and the more you have, the more I have.

    There’s an old joke about some people looking for Mr./Ms. Right and others looking for Mr./Ms. Right Now. But you might also find some success presenting yourself as Mr./Ms. Right When It Happens. Of course, not all of your invested time and energy will pay off, but it will often enough that I think it’s worth trying.

    This article has been republished with permission from Charlie Glickman.
    Please visit Charlie Glickman’s website  to view original post and more of Charlie’s works.

  • INFOG: Everyone You Know Watches Porn

    30% of all internet bandwidth is used for Porn! With more monthly unique visitors than Netflix, Amazon and Twitter combined it’s no wonder Eat24 managed to run an amazingly successful ad campaign. Well here’s some interesting facts that would surprise you …

    everyone-you-know-watches-porn

    Explore more infographics like this one on the web’s largest information design community.

  • Singaporeans and sex – are they or aren’t they??

    Singaporeans aren’t having much sex. No two ways around this – all research done on this topic points towards this conclusion.

    Going back a little bit into history to the 2003 Durex Global Sex Survey, Singapore had the lowest sexual frequency in the world, with Singaporeans having sex 96 times a year, with the next two lowest countries being Malaysia (100/yr) and Sweden (102/yr). In the 2005, Singapore’s figure was 73 times a year, with 58% of those surveyed unhappy about their sex lives. Last year, a Straits Times survey found that this sexual frequency had been reduced to an average of 5 times per month – roughly equated to 60 times annually. The respondents were also asked what their ideal frequency was (8 times/month).

    Some conclusions can definitely be gathered from these various surveys. Although the parameters around each were different, common themes that come out are that

    1. Singaporean’s aren’t having much sex (and the frequency keeps dropping); and
    2. Singaporeans aren’t satisfied with their sex life (or lack thereof) and want more sex.

    Two thoughts stem from these results. First of is why this is so. Why are Singaporeans having so little sex? Why are so many Singaporeans unhappy with their sex lives? Is it a given that these two questions are interlinked, or could they be separate? I’ll think on this, and hopefully you guys reading think on this, and perhaps we’ll deal with this in a separate article.

    This is the second thought arising from the results – is this really true? Are Singaporeans really having so little sex? From the multiple surveys cited earlier, it does seem so. But let’s look at some other evidence (these are just the more prominent ones that I can think of).

    1. The underage prostitute and the 51 very rich and powerful men implicated in the saga
    2. Underage Vietnamese prostitutes – I think 9 men were charged for this
    3. Sex for Contracts scandals with top Civil Servant(s) involved
    4. Sex for Grades with a University Law Professor
    5. Multiple cases between teachers and students (don’t we all fantasize about a teacher we had)
    6. Psychiatrist with a married patient

    These are all cases from the news. In the course of my professional and personal life, I’ve also come across many people whom I know to be having sex outside their relationships. Therefore it does seem that there’s lots of raunchy stuff going on in Singapore – just not with partners/ spouses.

    There are many reasons to explain this, if it is indeed the case.

    At this point, let me just say that being morally ambiguous, I make no judgements, nor am I in any position to do so. If I could posit a theory as to why this is so, perhaps it’s because relationships become stale, or specifically, that sex in a relationship becomes stale. I truly believe that couples need to make effort to spice things up in the bedroom in order to rediscover themselves, each other and push the boundaries of what they think they’re comfortable with. Break routines (don’t do the ‘Saturday is bonk-day’ thing), be spontaneous. Try new places, new positions, and you know what – new toys. I truly truly believe that they key to a better sex life is experimentation and adventure – whether or not you’re in a relationship or not. But please, please – remember safe sex, an unwanted pregnancy or a STI really ain’t no fun.

  • Sexual education, is it being done the right way?

    Sexual education, is it being done the right way?

    An article from the Today paper titled “Elderly should get sex education, too” caught my eye and it was quite an interesting read.  There is a growing concern in the increase of sexually-transmitted infections (STI) among persons aged 50 and above. The top 3 common STIs in this age group were gonorrhoea, non-infectious syphilis, and genital herpes.  Various reasons were mentioned for the increase in STIs.  For men, it was the option of commercial sources of sex such as prostitution and less sex with their partners.  For the women, a drop in condom usage as they got older.

    What set me thinking was the point being made in the article that the experts consulted in the study highlighted the urgent need for education and campaigns to be implemented.  Is our society lacking in this aspect of sexual education?  Or are we just blindly rolling out campaigns and ads but not creating an engaging society because sex is still considered taboo?

    Doing some further digging, I found statistics from the 2004 global sex survey done by Durex which stated that the average age a Singaporean youth loses his/her virginity is at the age of 19.  39% of Singaporean youths have unprotected sex, they have sex an average of 79 times a year and have 5.8 partners on average.  Now 39% is a very high number, with almost one in two youths putting themselves at risk of STIs and unwanted pregnancies.  There were other articles online on unprotected sex among youths and all I can say is that Singaporeans are having lots of sex, more than what is published or spoken, the key thing in educating them is to ensure that they are properly informed on the risks of unprotected sex and the ways they can protect themselves.

    Seems like it’s all Singaporeans who need to be educated on safe sex and not just the elderly from the short research I have done.  Let’s start by being more open to discussion about sex at all ages and remove the stigma that sex is something to be kept private.  For instance, people should not be shy to be seen buying condoms or even owning one.  Instead, they should be respected for being responsible not only for themselves but also to their partners by practicing safe sex.

    The full article mentioned can be read in its entirety here: http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/elderly-should-get-sex-education-too

  • Ashley Madison—The Infidelity Juggernaut Comes to Asia

    Ashley Madison—The Infidelity Juggernaut Comes to Asia

    The online dating site Ashleymadison.com made headlines recently due to the launch of its website for the first time in Asia. The website focusing on infidelity (it’s slogan is ‘Life is short. Have an affair’) was launched in 2001 and its response since then has been overwhelming – the site has since expanded to almost 30 countries worldwide, with a membership approaching 20 million and receiving 1.8 million unique hits per month.

    It seems that the appetite for infidelity is insatiable apparently. In June, the company launched its Japan site – the first in Asia – and its Hong Kong site last month. Since the launch, Japanese membership has reached half a million, with Hong Kong hitting 80,000 members since launch, making it the “most successful launch rate per capita, showing a ‘massive pent up demand’” According to Noel Biderman, the company’s CEO, the site plans to expand to 10 or 11 more markets in Asia as well.

    Of course, a site such as this has come under plenty of criticism since its launch. Its success debunks any notion that there is no demand though. Biderman has stated in many interviews that human beings will cheat anyway – all he provides is a platform for them to do it, stating that no one without the intention to cheat would sign up for membership.

    Well on that point I have to say I both agree and disagree. I agree because there is an inherent sense of morality that society places on its members. This stems from sources such as religion, and perhaps Confucian ideals as well in the Asian context. The need to maintain this level of morality in society has led to everyone from commentators to religious and political figures condemning ‘immorality’ and lamenting the moral decay of society. It is this expectation of morality which has led to a succession of ads and sponsorships offered by Ashley Madison being rejected. For example, the Toronto Transit Commission rejected $200,000 worth of advertising on its streetcars, with its commissioner stating that ‘When it’s a core fundamental value around cheating or lying, we’re not going to let those kinds of ads go on’.

    That said, my points of disagreement stem from me admitting that I subscribe to the Hobbesian theory on the state of nature, whereby life is of course ‘nasty, brutish and short’. What Hobbes meant was that humans, if left to their solitary devices, would fall back into their base states of brutishness and misery if there were no regulations and order provided by a central authority. Therefore to me, people would run wild (have affairs, commit crimes etc) if there were no barriers to doing so. Morality has no place in this. The key here is opportunity. As long as there are opportunities provided, humans will revert to their base states of nature and in this context – cheat.

    That’s it, just found some interesting articles on a topic which I’m sure is close to everyone’s heart (let’s face it – who in a relationship here hasn’t fantasised on someone else), and wanted to share my thoughts on it. I can at least say for certain that Ashley Madison won’t be coming to Singapore any time soon. Fortunately or unfortunately, that’s for you readers to think on and decide.