Tag: Charlie Glickman

  • What’s The Big Deal About Women Earning More Than Men?

    What’s The Big Deal About Women Earning More Than Men?

     

    About ten years ago, Laurie Toby Edison published Familiar Men, a book of non-erotic nudes of men. It’s an amazing book, and I was proud to contribute The Day I Found My Ass for it. Edison captured some deeply moving images of men of many different ages, races, and backgrounds to show how our perception of nudity and sexualization differ when men are the focus, rather than women.

    I remember going to one of her signings and hearing her talk about the response her photos received. Edison said that one of the most common questions she heard was, “What do these men do?” It took her by surprise, until she realized that most people are used to looking at how men are dressed and how we act in order to figure out what we do for a living. So many of the definitions of masculinity are tied up in being a provider, being a worker, being a breadwinner, that when the visual cues are taken away, a lot of people are confused. Of course, that’s really only the case in non-sexual photos like those in Familiar Men, and there aren’t too many of those. How many nude images of men can you think of that weren’t intended to be sexual?

    I’ve been thinking about this in light of the recently-released study showing that 4 out of 10 US households with children have mothers who are the primary or sole earner for her family and the predictable right-wing freakout about that. I think it’s important to unpack what it means when someone like conservative radio host Brian Fischer means when he says, “I don’t think it’s a healthy dynamic to have a wife outearn her husband, because so much of his sense of worth as a male is tied up with what he does vocationally.” Why is so much of men’s self-worth tied to how we labor? Why is what we do for a living one of the first things people ask about?

    “What do you do?” is one of the most common party conversation openers. Of course, that’s an easy topic to talk about, though I wonder if social conventions will change in response to our disastrous economy and the desire to avoid unpleasant topics at a dinner party. But why do so many men base their sense of personal value on what their income is? And why do so many women in these situations do more childcare and household labor to bolster their partners’ egos?

    This seems like an especially important question to consider in a world in which global wealth inequality is growing faster than ever.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=QPKKQnijnsM

    If these right wing pundits really want to make it possible for male-female couples to raise children on one income, they might consider pushing for the economic structures that would make that possible. But leaving aside their logical inconsistencies and how they deal with cognitive dissonance by insisting that men are designed (despite the actual science) to be the breadwinners, it seems to me that masculinity is at a turning point.

    For a long time, we’ve defined masculinity in terms of “performance.” Using things like job performance, sexual performance, or athletic performance as our measuring tools creates men who look strong, but are hollow on the inside. When jobs are lost or bodies change, when the performance shifts, many men struggle with their self-worth. It’s in these situations that men’s egos get coddled, because that seems easier than reinventing what it means to be a man.

    I think it’s time for us to stop defining our value by looking at how we perform. I think it’s time for us to ask ourselves what value be bring to our relationships, to our communities, and to the world. I want to see masculinity defined as something more than how well we score.

    That’s not an easy path because it means that we need to look at how fear and shame have been used to control us. We need to explore the messages we’ve been forced to accept about ourselves. We need to create our self-worth, instead of getting it from performing to some external standard. And we need to learn new tools for dealing with the parts of ourselves that we’ve been avoiding. In my work as a coach, I’ve spoken with a lot of men and their partners about these kinds of things and I’m always amazed at the courage it takes to step out of the Act Like a Man Box.

    And that’s the turning point we’re at. It’s time for us to be brave enough to decide that being a man isn’t about performance or scoring. It’s time to make it about something that really matters.


    This article has been republished with permission from Charlie Glickman. Please visit Charlie Glickman’s website  to view original post and more of Charlie’s works.


    Images courtesy of Shutterstock and Charlie Glickman

    Join SimplySxy’s forum discussions now on Society
    Do not miss another article on SimplySxy!  Follow us on Facebook and Twitter for our latest updates!

  • What Revenge Porn Tells Us About Sex and Humiliation

    What Revenge Porn Tells Us About Sex and Humiliation

    I’m always intrigued by the many ways that sex and shame intertwine in our culture, and “revenge porn” says a lot about that.  Revenge porn sites, if you aren’t familiar with them, are designed for men who want to upload sexy photos of their ex-girlfriends and lovers without permission.  One of the most common scenarios is for guys to take images that their partners shared with them while they were dating and use them to “get revenge” on them.  Whether it’s because of a bad breakup, lingering resentment, or simply a desire to lash out at an ex, it’s taking sexual shaming to a whole new level.

    Jill Filipovic and Thomas MacAulay Millar have already done an excellent job of discussing these sites and situating them within the context of the sexual shaming that celebrity women are subjected to, such as Matt Lauer’s insulting comments to Anne Hathaway (and her snappy retort, “I’m sorry that we live in a culture that commodifies sexuality of unwilling participants.“).  But there’s an element that I think they both miss.

    Our culture loves to humiliate people.  One of the reasons “reality shows” are so popular is the possibility of seeing a meltdown.  (Actually, given how the shows are designed, it’s pretty much a guarantee.)  Think about how many talk shows are structured to give the viewer a chance to shake their heads or boo a speaker.  And a quick look at the supermarket checkout stand will give you plenty of examples of articles about “worst beach bodies.”  For that matter, what about all of those magazine articles that mock someone’s clothing, makeup, or hair on the red carpet?  As a society, we clearly enjoy shaming and humiliating people.

    Of course, there’s a clear gender imbalance here.  Women are subject to much, much more scrutiny when it comes to physical appearance.  Every aspect of a woman’s outfit or hairstyle or presentation is an opportunity for someone to scoff, roll their eyes, or talk about how it shows off all of her “flaws.”  According to Brene Brown, men’s shame usually centers on not appearing weak while women’s shame often revolves around not being perfect.  It’s no wonder, given that women get attacked for not being flawless.

    But in addition to everything that Filipovic and Miller say regarding revenge porn, consent, and sexual assault, I think we also need to ask ourselves why, precisely, we think there’s something so shameful about sex that a photo of a woman giving a blow job or showing her breasts justifies her losing her job or being shamed.  Why did the photo of Anne Hathaway without underwear provoke so many responses?  Have none of those people ever gone commando themselves?  Have none of them ever seen a vulva?  And while there’s certainly no shortage of woman-shaming around other aspects of life, why in the world is it so much more virulent, threatening, and pervasive when it comes to sex?

    I know that sexism is a huge piece of that.  But so is sex-negativity and sexual shame.  Plenty of people have written volumes about slut-shaming and how it’s used to police women’s choices. (I’ve had quite a bit to say on the topic, myself.)  And what’s often left out of some of those discussions is the fact that sexual shaming only makes sense if you think that sex is shameful.  Sexualized shaming of women only makes sense if you think that women’s sexuality is shameful.  Getting off on sexualized shaming of women only happens if you get off on shaming and humiliating women.

    So ask yourself – do you get a thrill when you see a fashion disaster?  Do you enjoy a feeling of smug superiority when you hear about a celebrity trainwreck or when you see someone in a paparazzi photo that shows them simply being human instead of being perfect?  If you do, then you might want to consider what makes you different from the men who created or participate on revenge porn sites.  It’s easy to attack and blame them for their violations of women’s consent, for their sexualized shaming of their exes, and for being creepy.  But maybe it’s time that we take a look at how many ways we create a culture in which their behaviour is simply a more extreme version of some behaviours that we don’t even notice anymore.  Creepshots are pretty closely related to paparazzi photos, after all.

    I’d love to live in a society that doesn’t get off on shaming people.  Shame is powerful and while it can serve some positive purposes, as a culture, we’ve allowed ourselves to become hooked on it.  I don’t see how that can be a good thing, and I think it’s up to each of us to find healthier ways to move through the world.  One step we can take is to stop indulging our taste for shaming, especially sexualized shaming of women.  And maybe the next time a celebrity does something embarrassing, we could just let it go.  Maybe we could see what it’s like to not mock or shame people.  Maybe we could ask ourselves why we get off on humiliating other people, how that shapes our relationships, and what that says about our own choices.

    This article has been republished with permission from Charlie Glickman. Please visit Charlie Glickman’s website  to view original post and more of Charlie’s works.

    Image courtesy of Shutterstock

    Do not miss another article on SimplySxy!  Follow us on Facebook and Twitter for our latest updates!